I had one of those insight moments last night where I realized that the work I've been doing fits in with the work I did for my areas, particularly my f

The big question I asked my advisor was how to approach non-literary texts from a literary perspective. He said that training as a literary scholar will naturally lead to literary questions (of genre, rhetoric, voice, (self-)representation, constructions of identity and authority, audience, etc.), but that my question now should really be how construct my work so that literary and non-literary texts interact. He cautioned against focusing solely on non-literary works (as he did; it makes the job market more difficult because one might be seen as too non-literary [this may be particularly true in Ren studies]), and encouraged me to focus on mother-queen images in Spenser, Shakespeare, and Sidney (again, making my areas work helpful), using non-literary texts to support and broaden my arguments.
In a week where I've felt more like quitting than like plugging along, this advisor response was a much needed and positive motivator. How did I manage to luck into the most awesome advisor (for me) ever?
“HEARE LYES (EXPECTING THE SECOND COMMINGE OF OUR SAVIOVR CHRIST JESUS) THE BODY OF EDMOND SPENCER THE PRINCE OF POETS IN HIS TYME WHOSE DIVINE SPIRRIT NEEDS NOE OTHIR WITNESSE THEN THE WORKS WHICH HE LEFT BEHINDE HIM. HE WAS BORNE IN LONDON IN THE YEARE 1553 AND DIED IN THE YEARE 1598. Restored by private subscription 1778”.
1 comment:
Glad you got helpful feedback! The topic ideas seem really interesting, and seem to be taking shape! Cool!
Post a Comment